Dear members,

Thanks to all of you for contributing to this discussion. 

Here is a summary of the suggestions and ideas shared:

• Quality projects should clearly contribute to a bigger developmental impact of the country.
• Projects should have clear objectives, milestones and monitoring of deliverables.
• Commitment and ownership by the government is key; this goes beyond the signing of the financial agreement and includes the actual commitment of human and financial resources.
• Participation of beneficiaries since the design stage can help in ensuring that the project address a problem that is relevant to them. 
• Projects should be relevant to the beneficiaries: “to the point that they are conscious of their right to hold project management units and concerned ministries to account”.
• Having qualified management teams, who will ensure that projects are implemented with efficiency, quality, meritocracy, inclusiveness and sustainability in mind.
• Donors and steering committees have a critical role in guiding project implementation, provided that members are knowledgeable about the project and have time to add value to it, and able to critically review implementation and provide directive for improvement.
• There is a limited use of past lessons to inform new project design. Programmes should develop and validate key lessons, innovations and good practices experienced and these should inform new design/appraisal missions and future interventions.
• There is reluctance to stop poorly conceived projects, even when it is clear that these will not achieve their objectives.
• Projects should have a sustainability plan and exit strategy, including hand over of interventions to existing institutions or structures that are prepared to take over the management and operationalization of project outcomes. 

I look forward to further exchanges with the Community!

Carlos