Dear Monir Wahas, thank you - indeed I also thought about mapping the TAPE criteria against the DAC criteria. For instance, the TAPE criteria on productivity to the standard evaluation criteria on effectiveness and impact; the TAPE criteria on income, added value and resilience to evaluation criteria of sustainability (economic). However, in consultation with evaluation colleagues, we thought a good first step would be to present the TAPE without this mapping, to avoid confusion (also the placement of some of the criteria is debatable).
RE: Evaluation and performance assessments for agroecology
Dear Monir Wahas, thank you - indeed I also thought about mapping the TAPE criteria against the DAC criteria. For instance, the TAPE criteria on productivity to the standard evaluation criteria on effectiveness and impact; the TAPE criteria on income, added value and resilience to evaluation criteria of sustainability (economic). However, in consultation with evaluation colleagues, we thought a good first step would be to present the TAPE without this mapping, to avoid confusion (also the placement of some of the criteria is debatable).