reflecting on your interesting comments, I think we still have a great challenge in the process of "disciplinary" triangulation in a specific way, and not limiting it only to the triangulation of data according to their origin. In other words, triangulation processes, as stated by Okuda and Gómez, and SAMAJA, may well refer to the use of various methods (both quantitative and qualitative), data sources, theories, researchers or environments in the study of a phenomenon. I consider that most cases refer more to the triangulation of data as in the case of this evaluation of the "Cooperating Basque Youth" programme of 2018 (in Spanish), but I shall continue to investigate more about the implementation of a more interdisciplinary triangulation.
RE: How are mixed methods used in programme evaluation?
Hi Jean Providence,
reflecting on your interesting comments, I think we still have a great challenge in the process of "disciplinary" triangulation in a specific way, and not limiting it only to the triangulation of data according to their origin. In other words, triangulation processes, as stated by Okuda and Gómez, and SAMAJA, may well refer to the use of various methods (both quantitative and qualitative), data sources, theories, researchers or environments in the study of a phenomenon. I consider that most cases refer more to the triangulation of data as in the case of this evaluation of the "Cooperating Basque Youth" programme of 2018 (in Spanish), but I shall continue to investigate more about the implementation of a more interdisciplinary triangulation.
[Translated from Spanish]