The evaluation community has emphasized the significant role of evaluation in advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and a recent UN Resolution advocates for the integration of evaluation in countries Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs). But what are the concrete practices?
This discussion invites to share understanding, experience and initiatives to assess the value of agroecology in terms of its potential contribution to poverty alleviation, human health, and the environment.
This discussion invites you to share specific experiences and lessons on how qualitative methods interact with quantitative methods and to provide some links to evaluation reports and publications where mixed methods are used.
It is of paramount importance to involve marginalized groups and communities, especially People with Disabilities, to capture their inputs into evaluation results. Please share views and experiences.
Following the successful discussion last year, I would like to hear your reflections on the beta version of the Evaluation Guidelines on Applying Quality of Research for Development Frame of Reference to Process and Performance Evaluations.
Reporting evaluation results and communicating evaluation results are two different processes, with communication being particularly relevant for the uptake of evaluation results. However, the responsibilities and funding arrangements for communication seem blurred. What do you think?
MEL – Monitoring Evaluation and Learning or MEAL - Monitoring Evaluation Accountability and Learning systems rarely include cross cutting issues such as gender and leave-no-one behind principles. How can we develop effective and inclusive systems and what are the constraints in doing so?