Join the discussion

If you have commissioned or participated in an evaluability assessment or used evaluability assessment results when managing evaluations, please share your insights and reflections.

Balancing diverse stakeholder needs and ensuring actionable recommendations are crucial to foster inclusive and effective evaluations. How do you navigate between different interests, cultural differences and political pressure?

Evaluation managers contribute to the success of the evaluation process and help organizations make informed decisions based on evidence. What are your views and suggestions on how evaluation managers should engage to ensure effective evaluation?

This discussion invites to share evaluation methods and indicators to capture the impact of development projects on the environment or climate change.

How can we as evaluators take advantage of Artificial Intelligence in our professional activities?

The evaluation community has emphasized the significant role of evaluation in advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and a recent UN Resolution advocates for the integration of evaluation in countries Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs). But what are the concrete practices?

This discussion invites to share understanding, experience and initiatives to assess the value of agroecology in terms of its potential contribution to poverty alleviation, human health, and the environment.

This discussion invites you to share specific experiences and lessons on how qualitative methods interact with quantitative methods and to provide some links to evaluation reports and publications where mixed methods are used.

It is of paramount importance to involve marginalized groups and communities, especially People with Disabilities, to capture their inputs into evaluation results. Please share views and experiences.

This discussion aims at sharing ideas and examples on the use of visuals in evaluation.

Following the successful discussion last year, I would like to hear your reflections on the beta version of the Evaluation Guidelines on Applying Quality of Research for Development Frame of Reference to Process and Performance Evaluations.

Reporting evaluation results and communicating evaluation results are two different processes, with communication being particularly relevant for the uptake of evaluation results. However, the responsibilities and funding arrangements for communication seem blurred. What do you think?