Kristen is an impact evaluation analyst at WFP, coordinating the cash-based transfers and gender window of work, as well as gender-related analysis in the overall impact evaluation portfolio. She received an MSc in Impact Evaluation for International Development at the University of East Anglia. Prior to WFP, Kristen conducted research with the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), and Oxfam GB, where she co-published a meta-analysis of Oxfam’s impact evaluations on women’s empowerment.
Kristen [user:field_middlename] McCollum
Kristen McCollum
Impact Evaluation Analyst
World Food Programme
Italy
My contributions
Cash-based transfers in crisis: Why more evidence is needed to support women in crisis, and what we’re doing about it
Blog[1] These disasters carry particular consequences for women and girls, who are more likely to experience gender-based violence, assume additional care and labour burdens, or adopt negative coping strategies as a result. Meanwhile, cash-based interventions are rising in popularity as a preferred option of humanitarian aid delivery.
Cash-based transfers have long been a focus of study, starting when Mexico’s Progresa and its experimental evaluation design first made waves in the late 1990s. Since then, evidence has been building almost as rapidly as cash-transfer programmes have expanded globally. When the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) took on the task of reviewing the
Posted by
Jonas Leo Heirman
Evaluation Officer (Impact Evaluation) World Food ProgrammeKristen McCollum
Impact Evaluation Analyst World Food ProgrammeFive Myths about Impact Evaluation in the Humanitarian Space
BlogHumanitarian contexts are too difficult for impact evaluations
Yes, conducting an impact evaluation becomes particularly challenging in crisis- and conflict-affected settings, but it can be done. The evaluation of Impacts of the World Food Programme’s interventions to treat malnutrition in Niger found that children who received both food for assets (FFA), and treatment and prevention assistance were 20 percent less likely to suffer moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) than children receiving no assistance. The World Bank’s impact evaluation of Afghanistan’s National Solidarity Programme – with WFP as an implementing partner – is another good example. In contexts with levels of insecurity
Posted by
Jonas Leo Heirman
Evaluation Officer (Impact Evaluation) World Food ProgrammeKristen McCollum
Impact Evaluation Analyst World Food Programme