Following the successful discussion last year, I would like to hear your reflections on the beta version of the Evaluation Guidelines on Applying Quality of Research for Development Frame of Reference to Process and Performance Evaluations.

Reporting evaluation results and communicating evaluation results are two different processes, with communication being particularly relevant for the uptake of evaluation results. However, the responsibilities and funding arrangements for communication seem blurred. What do you think?

Why are systems supposedly designed to help us learn from experience been so reluctant to learn from their own experience?

We invite you to take this quick and fun quiz and see what type of evaluator profile emerges. Let us know what you think!